Can baclofen cause false positive drug test
Similar channels
What is ghb drugs
Can gabapentin cause a false positive on a drug test? No, gabapentin is not known to cause false positives on drug tests. How long does
Class 1 antiarrhythmic drugs
Can Buspirone Cause False Positive Drug Tests? Buspirone is not known to cause false positive drug tests for benzodiazepines or any other drugs.
Does edema from gabapentin go away
drugs can cause false positives for methamphetamine on drug tests show a false positive on methamphetamine tests? Answer.
Bupropion addiction
antidepressants. Can gabapentin cause false positive on drug test? No, gabapentin does not cause false positives on drug tests. While it
Does ibuprofen damage liver
Can gabapentin cause a false positive on a drug test? No, gabapentin is not known to cause false positives on drug tests. How long does
Seroquel for ptsd
These 10 Medications Can Cause a False Positive on Drug Tests Some medications can cause a false positive on a urine drug test.
Can phentermine cause kidney damage
Can gabapentin cause a false positive on a drug test? No, gabapentin is not known to cause false positives on drug tests. How long does
Taking vyvanse with adderall
Can gabapentin cause a false positive on a drug test? No, gabapentin is not known to cause false positives on drug tests. How long does
Amiodarone side effects elderly
Can Buspirone Cause False Positive Drug Tests? Buspirone is not known to cause false positive drug tests for benzodiazepines or any other drugs.
Comments
It's not like "Let me immediately take action based on belief in the complete accuracy of a single medical report" isn't the norm in such stories. Arguably, her real fault wasn't in sleeping around, it was in going home and thinking there was going to be a marriage left after she blew it up.
(And, to be honest, I'm sure many of the readers don't actually understand how false positives work. If you get a positive result on a 99% accurate test, that doesn't mean there's only a 1% chance of it being wrong.
On rare diseases, a positive result is very likely to be a false one, simply by the weight of numbers: If a test is 99% accurate, and 100,000 people get tested for a disease that only 500 of them have, then you're going to end up with 495 true positive results (99% of the sick people got accurate results) and 995 false positive results (1% of the healthy people got inaccurate results). In case like this, that would mean that a positive result in a 99% accurate test is only actually a ~33% chance that you have the disease.
tl;dr: The doctor was an idiot, and the ending should have included a malpractice lawsuit for failing basic math.)